Motion fieldnotes

Working comparisons / checkpoint progress

Next: 100.

25 earlier published drafts + 11 new under-review groups = 36 playable draft groups. 64 additional distinct playable draft groups are needed to reach 100. A queue item, research note, revision or second content variant does not count as another treatment.

Watch all 11 new groups ↓ · Review progress

25Earlier published drafts
11New under-review groups
36Playable draft groups
0 / 200Completed treatments
36 of 100

Current work

0 builders · 0 critics at this recorded snapshot

PieceStageRemaining work
Delimiter timing and empty holdstatic preference recordedBoth supplied-file comparisons favor our variants, with local ties retained. A native-source replacement is prepared; the earlier preference cannot serve as its review.
Range selection and camera returnstatic preference recordedSix consecutive lossless source parts are available, still one treatment. The bounded private single-file attempt failed; native-source re-review remains open. Earlier supplied-file preferences remain provisional.
Three-file selection and drag handoffstatic preference recordedBoth supplied-file comparisons favor our variants. Shared post-drop occlusion and local losses remain. The exact-source replacement still needs a fresh review.
Layer insertion, resizing and placementrepair requiredBoth fresh sixth-version comparisons tie. Our contours and frozen cursor glyphs improve local units, while the source keeps clearer device-rim and UI-wording detail. Both show the sticker partly outside the bottom edge during placement; intent is unresolved. Do not silently change native choreography to win a frozen-frame comparison. Native spatial coverage is 7.90%; timing and moving-review gaps remain open.
Pane allocation, blank wait and resultstatic preference recordedBoth supplied-file comparisons favor the changed variants. Pointer changes are editorial choices. Exact-source replacement review is still required; unexplained source glyphs and local unit losses remain recorded.
Screen-fixed identity across a cutstatic preference recordedBoth supplied-file comparisons favor our variants. The lower-third alias counts as the same group. The source-exact two-part public reference is prepared; native-source re-review remains open.
Topic arrivals, holds and ordered releaserepair requiredBoth native-source comparisons tie. The largest reported cup-clearance concern belongs to the source, not our candidates, and does not establish a candidate win. Unit results and native-spatial gaps remain open.
Resolving cards and interrupted contractionblockedVersion three removes unnecessary identity 3D transforms; both actual package replays now match file bytes, all 145 RGB/YUV frames and clocks. A fresh visual review is still required. Its packet stopped at the historical September 10, 2026 20 GiB run cap; staging capacity under the September 11 approval is reserved before more packets. The gallery deliberately retains the source-losing first version and its failed replay history, not the unreviewed repair.
Table browse and partial returnblockedVersion four is rendered and sealed with a persistent off-phone row guide, explicitly an editorial original-content adaptation. Both actual package replays match bytes, RGB/YUV and native clocks; the previous trajectory, mask and partial return are preserved. The prior TIE/TIE verdict remains. Its fresh critic packet stopped at the historical September 10, 2026 20 GiB run cap; staging capacity under the September 11 approval is reserved before more packets. The gallery keeps reviewed version three.
Two-line title arrival and reading holdblockedThe source wins both fourth-version comparisons. Version five changes raster sampling and has exact actual package replays, but its new review packet stopped at the historical September 10, 2026 20 GiB run cap. Staging capacity under the September 11 approval is reserved before more packets. The gallery retains the reviewed fourth version. Native-spatial gaps and duration-field differences remain unresolved.
Code rows and a growing emphasis blockblockedThe third version replaces the fractional highlight edge with a full-row fading backdrop. Both actual package replays match bytes, RGB/YUV frames and clocks. Three stricter new-row-only pixel checks still fail inside the emphasis field, and source duration fields differ by up to 0.6875 ms. Its fresh packet stopped at the historical September 10, 2026 20 GiB run cap; staging capacity under the September 11 approval is reserved before more packets. The gallery keeps the source-losing second version and its verdict.
Ordinary long tutorial: source-only intakesource inspectionA sealed intake covers source frames [105, 225), 3.5–7.5 seconds, of Build Hour: Agent RFT. It records the hard slide cut at 179–180 with a persistent presenter inset. Fitted consecutive frames and native crops are not whole-video moving review. Novelty against the existing continuity group remains unresolved; no new render or group is counted.

Actual renders under review

11 groups: 10 paired comparisons + 1 segmented-source group. Jump to the segmented-source carousel →

These are under-review drafts, not ready additions. Each has a brief source excerpt, both rendered content variants and native controls. Clock differences and review gaps remain explicit. Downloads remain withheld pending verification.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Delimiter lead, empty hold, then word construction

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Build and share apps in Codex · source [699, 885) · 3.100000 s · 2026-06-02

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Re-encoded comparison reference; retained supplied-file static preferences are provisional. Native-source re-review is pending.

Both selected variants are preferred overall in the third independent static comparison. Many individual units still tie; this is not an all-unit or moving-footage pass. The strongest remaining clearance defect in that review belongs to the source, not these selected renders. No timing or completion credit.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • The delimiter-only lead and held empty interval.
  • Shared travel, glyph entry and connector optics.
  • The completed phrase and reading hold.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • The comparison reference is re-encoded. An independent original-master check found differences in 186/186 RGB frames and 186/186 native YUV frames. Pixel differences do not establish a perceptual defect or explain a prior preference. Native-source re-review is pending; supplied-file static preferences remain provisional.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

A text range through the returning camera

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Prototyping with canvas in ChatGPT · source [1608, 1752) · 6.000000 s · 2025-04-08

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Re-encoded comparison reference; retained supplied-file static preferences are provisional. Native-source re-review is pending.

Both selected variants are preferred overall in the third independent static comparison. Frozen-frame pointer clarity is not proof of better movement; native-spatial gaps and local unit results remain recorded. The endpoint, cursor-shape, target and ending-opacity repairs retain their source timing. No motion or completion credit.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • The range endpoints and growing highlight.
  • Pointer, text and camera displacement together.
  • The exposed workspace and retained selection.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • The comparison reference is re-encoded. An independent original-master check found differences in 144/144 RGB frames and 144/144 native YUV frames. Pixel differences do not establish a perceptual defect or explain a prior preference. Native-source re-review is pending; supplied-file static preferences remain provisional.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Three selected files, detached ghost and a relocated cue

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Record & Replay in Codex · source [1504, 1628) · 5.171833 s · 2026-06-18

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Re-encoded comparison reference; retained supplied-file static preferences are provisional. Native-source re-review is pending.

Both selected variants are preferred overall in the third static comparison. The deliberately relocated cue is an editorial adaptation, not a corrected source observation. A shared post-drop obstruction still hides the third attachment identity in source and reconstruction; the faithful earlier version and that limitation remain recorded. No motion or completion credit.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • The selected file count and drag-ghost detachment.
  • Pointer and window occlusion during the crossing.
  • Explicit editorial cue relocation, with the source overlap and unfinished outgoing context still documented.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • The comparison reference is re-encoded. An independent original-master check found differences in 124/124 RGB frames and 124/124 native YUV frames. Pixel differences do not establish a perceptual defect or explain a prior preference. Native-source re-review is pending; supplied-file static preferences remain provisional.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Oversized layer insertion, resize and placement

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Transparent Layers with 4o Image Generation · source [1506, 1658) · 6.339688 s · 2025-03-25

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

The fresh sixth-version comparisons tie in both variants. Our sticker contours and frozen cursor glyphs win local units; the source retains clearer device-rim and UI-wording detail. The largest shared issue is part of the sticker leaving the bottom of the frame during intermediate placement. That may be intentional: it is not established as a broken interaction or final framing error. All 608 fitted states were viewed, with only 7.90% native spatial coverage. Clock and moving-review gaps remain open.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • The selected oversized layer and visible handles.
  • Pointer, resized object, contact shadow and placement together.
  • Source frame 1614, local frame 108: native bottom-boundary crops show lower sticker content outside the image in source and adaptation. Context checks show it fits at local frames 75 and 129. This intermediate excursion is not evidence of a broken mask or an approved reason to change the source choreography.
  • The still-selected resize-ready ending; no invented deselection or completed settle.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • This lossless reference preserves the selected original-master RGB/YUV frames and native timestamps in the independent decoder check. That does not establish browser-pixel equivalence, moving perception, full-video coverage or source-fidelity approval of the adaptation.
  • Measured source/output frame-position differences reach 0.625 milliseconds; frame-duration differences reach 0.0208333 milliseconds. Frame stepping uses separate native-clock tables. Matching positions do not erase or approve differing duration fields.
  • The excerpt coded duration differs from the next source-frame boundary by -0.3125 milliseconds. Both measurements remain in the timing JSON.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Stable window, split allocation, blank wait and result reveal

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Build and share interactive prototypes in Codex · source [1540, 1650) · 3.666667 s · 2026-06-04

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Re-encoded comparison reference; retained supplied-file static preferences are provisional. Native-source re-review is pending.

Both changed variants are preferred overall in the second static comparison. The pointer changes are explicitly editorial, not a claimed source software fix. The source retains two unexplained glyphs. Unit losses and native-spatial gaps remain recorded; source-encode integrity is being checked separately. No motion, fidelity or completion approval.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • Stable outer-window geometry while space is allocated to a result pane.
  • The blank wait, control states and result reveal.
  • Small control contrast, text edges and ending context.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • The comparison reference is re-encoded. An independent original-master check found differences in 110/110 RGB frames and 110/110 native YUV frames. Pixel differences do not establish a perceptual defect or explain a prior preference. Native-source re-review is pending; supplied-file static preferences remain provisional.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

A screen-fixed identity across a coverage cut

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

ChatGPT can now complete tasks on your computer · source [147, 294) · 6.131125 s · 2026-07-16

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Re-encoded comparison reference; retained supplied-file static preferences are provisional. Native-source re-review is pending.

Both changed variants are preferred overall in the second static comparison. Raising the close composition by 160 pixels preserves the screen-fixed identity, typography, cuts and native clock. The remaining contrast gap belongs to the reference side. Source-encode integrity is being checked separately; no motion or completion credit.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • The identity position and optical framing on either side of the coverage change.
  • The cut boundary versus movement within each view.
  • Overlay contrast, background continuity and ending context.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • The comparison reference is re-encoded. An independent original-master check found differences in 147/147 RGB frames and 147/147 native YUV frames. Pixel differences do not establish a perceptual defect or explain a prior preference. Native-source re-review is pending; supplied-file static preferences remain provisional.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Topic arrivals, independent settling and ordered release

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Scheduled Tasks · source [419, 495) · 3.169833 s · 2026-08-28

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Both fresh native-source comparisons tie. The largest reported text-to-cup clearance concern belongs to the source, not these candidates; a visible gap remains and no illegibility is claimed. That source-side concern does not make our whole treatment better. Local wins, losses and spatial gaps remain recorded; further builder review is required. No motion or completion credit.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • Whole-word and glyph-built text arrivals.
  • Independent line settling, overlapping actions and the common hold.
  • Ordered text release over a continuing original background.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • This lossless reference preserves the selected original-master RGB/YUV frames and native timestamps in the independent decoder check. That does not establish browser-pixel equivalence, moving perception, full-video coverage or source-fidelity approval of the adaptation.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Table browse, anchored heading and a partial return

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Research and compare products with ChatGPT · source [1640, 1911) · 4.516667 s · 2026-03-27

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

The fresh third-version comparisons tie in both variants. The earlier wrong-way reset is repaired, but both source and adaptation lose visible attribute-label context while showing the later product columns. Our clearer short strings and the source product surfaces win different local units. All 1,084 fitted states were viewed; native spatial coverage is 1.67%. A separate fourth-version editorial readability experiment is not an approved source behavior or a new treatment. No motion or completion approval.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • Source frames [1640, 1658), 27.333333–27.633333 s: the near-stationary baseline before the first clearly visible horizontal displacement. This is a bounded still-frame observation, not proof of absolute rest.
  • Source frames [1658, 1796), 27.633333–29.933333 s: leftward table translation and clipping inside the fixed phone aperture, with the heading anchored.
  • Estimated internal phase markers: a renewed larger leftward step around frame 1752 (29.200000 s), then a far-left extreme around frames 1772–1773 (29.533333–29.550000 s) and a small rightward recovery. Gesture, physics and separate-input count are not established.
  • Source return bracket [1796, 1911), 29.933333–31.850000 s: a larger decelerating rightward return to earlier columns. Inner phase boundaries are estimates, not exact input-event timestamps.
  • Manual endpoint estimate: the table remains roughly 17 source pixels short of its starting position. This is not an exact restoration, measured zero-velocity hold or clean loop.
  • Source frames [1774, 1780), local frames 134–139: native context checks show later product columns without the attribute-label column. Units make some values inferable; this is a reading-context limitation shared with the source, not proof of a masking bug. A retained semantic guide would be an editorial adaptation, not an observed source feature.
  • The next clearly visible vertical displacement starts at source frame 1911 (31.850000 s), outside this selected excerpt. Its absence here does not establish a completed whole-film action or rule out other small movements.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • This lossless reference preserves the selected original-master RGB/YUV frames and native timestamps in the independent decoder check. That does not establish browser-pixel equivalence, moving perception, full-video coverage or source-fidelity approval of the adaptation.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Two-line title arrival and reading hold

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Introducing ChatGPT Atlas · source [507, 597) · 3.000313 s · 2025-10-21

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

Both first native-source comparisons narrowly prefer the source. The critic finds rougher fine glyph contours in these fourth-version renders at local frames 58–62; six units tie in each comparison. A fifth-version raster-sampling repair is rendered and replay-checked, but its new critic packet remains pending; the newly approved storage is reserved for this publication first. This gallery retains the reviewed fourth version, not the unreviewed repair. Native-spatial gaps and duration-field differences remain open.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • Source cut pair 506→507, 16.867000→16.900000 s: the browser is replaced by a white title screen already showing five glyphs. The unseen first five glyph additions must not be invented. The preceding frame is context, outside this excerpt.
  • Source [507, 536), 16.900000–17.867000 s: first-line glyph additions accompany leftward displacement of existing glyphs. The complete first line is visible by frame 532; repeated wording does not imply identical pixels.
  • Source [536, 564), 17.867000–18.800000 s: the second line begins with three visible glyphs while the first line rises. Further glyph additions and leftward travel overlap; exact settling endpoints are not recovered authoring keyframes.
  • Source [564, 572), 18.800000–19.067000 s: the full phrase is present, but residual second-line travel and edge changes continue after the last glyph.
  • Source [572, 591), 19.067000–19.700000 s: a near-stationary reading interval contains three separate exact-RGB runs, not one identical-pixel hold. Small changes between the runs are not assigned a rendering cause.
  • Source [591, 597), 19.700000–19.900000 s: both lines enlarge slightly before the outgoing cut. The exact subpixel onset and easing remain unknown; the cut at frame 597 is outside the selected excerpt.
  • The fitted title surround and inspected native patches appear white. Uninspected native regions and faint measured residuals do not establish a separate blur trail, mask or wipe. Geist outlines and replacement copy remain editorial choices.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • The source coded tail is five ticks beyond the next-frame boundary at a 16,000 Hz timescale. Source positions, fixed packet-duration fields and output H.264 duration normalization remain separate measurements.
  • The builder replay uses pinned local dependencies and a disclosed local-only runtime workaround. It is not a clean-machine installation check.
  • This lossless reference preserves the selected original-master RGB/YUV frames and native timestamps in the independent decoder check. That does not establish browser-pixel equivalence, moving perception, full-video coverage or source-fidelity approval of the adaptation.
  • Measured source/output frame-position differences reach 0 milliseconds; frame-duration differences reach 0.6875 milliseconds. Frame stepping uses separate native-clock tables. Matching positions do not erase or approve differing duration fields.
  • The excerpt coded duration differs from the next source-frame boundary by 0.3125 milliseconds. Both measurements remain in the timing JSON.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

Code/SVG draft · Under review · Not completed

Code-row additions and a growing emphasis block

Actual selected renders under review. These are working comparisons, not verified-ready studies. The portable download is withheld while package checks and repairs continue.

Introducing Agent Plugins · source [2100, 2220) · 4.003312 s · 2026-08-06

Official source · brief silent excerpt
Our code/SVG draft · original content

Paired playback is approximate. Pause and step for exact native-frame correspondence.

The first native-source critic prefers the source in both variants. These second-version renders show a highlight boundary crossing a new row backdrop, especially local frame 44; clipped glyphs are not established. A third-version full-row backdrop repair is rendered and replay-checked but awaits a fresh packet; publication staging has storage priority. Three strict new-row-only pixel checks still fail inside the emphasis field, and duration fields remain different. The earlier source-winning verdict stays in force.

Small pieces, choreography and limitations
  • Source 2100→2101, 70.070000→70.103000 s: the first added code row, explorer folders and corner badge become discernible together. Sub-frame onset and exact opacity are not measured.
  • Subsequent rows first appear at source frames 2113, 2123, 2133, 2143, 2153, 2163, 2173, 2183, 2193, 2203 and 2213. The first gap is 0.400000 s; subsequent native-PTS gaps vary between 0.333000 and 0.334000 s. These are whole-row appearances, not observed character typing.
  • Source 2108→2109, 70.337000→70.370000 s: a new footer caption becomes discernible after a caption-free interval. Its estimated settling near frame 2118 is not an exact transform endpoint.
  • Source 2132→2133, 71.137000→71.171000 s: a blue emphasis background and left accent appear with the new row. Later rows extend the lower edge while the caption remains present.
  • Source final-row bracket 2212→2213, 73.807000→73.840000 s: the outer closing brace appears. The core looks settled by frame 2217, an estimate; this excerpt ends at 2220, not at the later caption exit.
  • No pointer, caret, scrolling, broad reframe or cut is apparent in the fitted field and four inspected native regions. The remaining native area is not certified free of micro-events. The caption exit and following caption occur outside this excerpt and remain separate source-context observations.
  • Native geometry and corresponding frame counts match. Each movie retains its own PTS; that does not establish source fidelity or resolve a clock discrepancy.
  • Full-video coverage and moving-source review are not complete. Native PNG availability is not evidence of human temporal inspection.
  • The source passage may begin or end within a larger action. Do not infer an unseen anticipation, settle or outcome.
  • Original text, drawing, font and content choices are adaptations. Source assets and full downloads are not included.
  • Publication is August 6, 2026. Metadata was retrieved on September 5, 2026 at 17:15:49 UTC, 128.397967 seconds after the recorded 17:13:40.602033 UTC cutoff; this retrieval qualification remains unresolved for collection sign-off.
  • The lossless reference preserves original 533-tick packet durations. Its coded tail is 11 ticks before the next-frame boundary; the outputs preserve positions but normalize duration fields differently. The lossy convenience preview is not used as the comparison reference.
  • This lossless reference preserves the selected original-master RGB/YUV frames and native timestamps in the independent decoder check. That does not establish browser-pixel equivalence, moving perception, full-video coverage or source-fidelity approval of the adaptation.
  • Measured source/output frame-position differences reach 0 milliseconds; frame-duration differences reach 0.6875 milliseconds. Frame stepping uses separate native-clock tables. Matching positions do not erase or approve differing duration fields.
  • The excerpt coded duration differs from the next source-frame boundary by -0.6875 milliseconds. Both measurements remain in the timing JSON.

Selected code/SVG candidates with original content; public package normalization remains a separate gate. The source excerpt is silent.

One more group · segmented source evidence

Recorded updates

  1. Independent native-Play testing found a first-click buffering stall that frame-button-first tests missed. The brief-clip delivery path has been corrected and is checked from a fresh native Play before any frame controls. Earlier failed attempts remain recorded. No media, native clocks, source annotations or fidelity judgments change.
  2. An independent delivery critic found that standalone second-render viewers overflowed before any interaction. The layout correction extends fitted player sizing to those viewers and confines opt-in native-size inspection to the player. Source footage, rendered clips, native timing and recorded fidelity verdicts are unchanged. Delivery review does not count as source-motion review.
  3. Live delivery exposed a real seekability failure: some raw clip responses produced an empty browser seek range. The paired players already buffered brief clips. Native and segmented players now use the same bounded, on-demand approach, and second-render links open native-clock viewers. No movie bytes, render, source timestamp or fidelity verdict changes. The first upload and its failed live check remain recorded; it was not accepted as a verified release.
  4. A separate publication reviewer found that the 11-group homepage link landed on a 10-comparison heading. This snapshot makes the 10 paired comparisons plus 1 segmented-source group explicit, adds direct links to all eleven groups, keeps re-encoded-reference qualifications visible, and makes narrow-screen task explanations readable. These publication corrections change no source movie, render, timing table or fidelity verdict.
  5. This snapshot prepares 11 under-review comparisons for publication. Live checks and a publisher receipt establish deployment. The 25 earlier published drafts plus these 11 distinct playable draft groups total 36, leaving 64 to reach 100. Ten paired studies and one segmented-source study are prepared. Revisions, content variants, source parts and the source-only intake do not increase the group count. The accepted public baseline remains 25; publication metadata is separate and grants no verified-ready or completion credit.
  6. Twenty-six static reviews are sealed: 15 candidate-preferred pairs, 23 source-preferred pairs and 14 ties across retained rounds. The fresh table and layer reviews each tie twice. These are review-history counts, not distinct successful treatments or moving-footage approvals.
  7. Both fresh critics and both bounded builders are finished. The table and layer reviews each tie twice; table native spatial coverage is 1.67% and layer coverage is 7.90%, with exact gaps retained. The latest four repairs, carousel version three, table version four, Atlas version five and plugin version three, await fresh independent comparisons. Their earlier reviewed renders and verdicts remain in the gallery; repairs do not inherit them. No builder or critic is active at this prepared snapshot.
  8. The carousel's third version has exact actual extracted-package replays after removing identity 3D transforms. The Atlas fifth version has a raster-sampling repair with exact replays. Neither inherits an earlier verdict. Their new critic packets stopped at the historical September 10, 2026 20 GiB run limit. Staging capacity under the September 11 approval is reserved before more packets.
  9. The latest four-repair mechanical audit independently decodes eight selected/replay pairs. Its append-only supplement resolves the initial failures as auditor accounting bugs: 15 Atlas members match at the declared extraction root, and both layer descriptors match their packaged generator contract. Nine corrected regression tests pass. The original failed report and seal remain unchanged; no builder file is altered to satisfy an auditor assumption. Scope exceptions and all zero credits remain.
  10. The September 8 inventory refresh exhausts 35 pages across Videos, Shorts, Live and the uploads playlist: 771 unique IDs. Seven additions have official feed publication dates after the frozen September 5, 2026 17:13:40.602033 UTC cutoff, so the in-window inventory remains 622. Earlier metadata was not fully refreshed; the uploads-only access exception remains unresolved.
  11. The last built gallery passed four browser configurations at September 10, 2026 04:09:23 UTC, with 30 paired checks, 10 alternate-render checks and 18 segmented/native-player checks. At that check, all 133 focused tests and four additional existing storage-bound tests passed; nine audit-correction regressions passed separately. Those historical checks do not validate this publication preview. Its build, publication-text scan, live checks and receipt belong to the publisher.
  12. The historical September 10, 2026 stop recorded allocated run usage of 21,474,320,384 bytes against the then-current 21,474,836,480-byte allowance, leaving only 516,096 bytes, about 0.49 MiB. The old guard counted logical file lengths; it now enforces the greater of logical and allocated usage, including directories and sparse files. Older logical reports cannot establish historical allocated peak usage. The normal 1 MiB tracker preflight rejected another build under that old limit; this is not a current usage measurement. No evidence is deleted.
  13. Full-video reviews, reviewed moving runtime, verified-ready additions, completed treatments and complete clean corpus passes remain zero. All public-facing motion findings retain inspection limits, cuts and source/proxy distinctions. New editable downloads remain withheld. Working comparisons are not fidelity approval or the requested 100-entry checkpoint.
  14. Accepted preservation was rechecked on September 10, 2026 at 04:17:55 UTC: 6,811 listed objects and the manifest remained unchanged, and the live manifest matched. No new deployment occurred at that check. It was read-only because further run-artifact writes were frozen under the historical 20 GiB limit.
  15. A tracker update correctly stopped when an active Chromium profile introduced temporary singleton links. The browser is closed and its runtime links are removed; the guard is not weakened. The failed attempt and the successful retry remain recorded, and no snapshot revision or source evidence was discarded.
  16. On September 10, 2026, snapshot 21, built at 04:07:21 UTC, remained the last served page and snapshot 22 was prepared only. On September 11, 2026, the user approved a 24 GiB run limit plus one additional staging copy capped at 3 GiB and requested public progress and examples. Staging capacity is reserved before more review packets; authorization alone does not establish a built stage or deployment. This snapshot 23 prepares under-review comparisons for the publisher without changing the accepted baseline, source evidence, verdicts or zero credits.

Snapshot 27 · 2026-09-11T05:53:21.617142+00:00

Checks for a later snapshot every 20 seconds. It does not infer worker activity.

Existing source research to route

These 100 source studies already exist on the site. They are leads for new code/SVG adaptations, not 100 new recipes. All have dated in-window metadata and a local source path; native timing and distinctness still need review. A source interval overlap is a warning to reconcile, not proof of equivalence.

100 existing research leads

Existing studyOfficial source / declared intervalOverlap with recipe groups
A chapter card is a cut, not a slide deckIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 16.6–20.2s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Sometimes the right zoom is a hard cutIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 22.5–24.8s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move quickly; let the interaction breatheA first look at the Codex app
2026-02-02 · 3.4–5.2s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Reveal where the results liveChatGPT Images
2025-12-16 · 47–51.5s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Open the artifact before explaining its controlsUpdates to deep research in ChatGPT
2026-02-10 · 58.5–63s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep one object through the context changeYou can just use your voice | ChatGPT Work
2026-08-24 · 18–24s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Show the target, the request, and the changed resultMeet ChatGPT Work
2026-07-09 · 64–72s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep the task frame; change the evidenceA Look at ChatGPT agent
2025-07-17 · 7–12s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Let the selected code carry the emphasisIntroducing Agent Plugins
2026-08-06 · 70–76s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
End the process on an inspectable artifactRecord & Replay in Codex
2026-06-18 · 44–51s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Select the target before entering the instructionBuild and test iOS apps without leaving Codex
2026-06-15 · 10–15s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Give the result a pane of its ownBuild and share interactive prototypes in Codex
2026-06-04 · 51–55s
split-result-pane-allocation
Slow down for the access decisionBuild and share apps in Codex
2026-06-02 · 25–29.5s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Show a control changing the resultCodex for data science
2026-06-09 · 38–44s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Pair a local request with the changed imageCreate campaign concepts and assets with Codex
2026-06-10 · 23–29s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move between related details, then stopAnalyze earnings and update your investment thesis with Codex
2026-06-12 · 65–69s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Attach the follow-up to its sourceChatGPT can now complete tasks on your computer
2026-07-16 · 30–35s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep background work visible through a context changeChatGPT Computer Use: Now faster with Live Picture-in-Picture
2026-07-10 · 25–29s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Crop to the selected object, then restore contextWork with docs, sheets, and slides in ChatGPT
2026-07-23 · 23–27.5s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Prove continuity with both devices in viewUse ChatGPT Work on Your Phone
2026-08-28 · 91–95s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Change the representation to answer a different questionMake information visual with ChatGPT
2026-08-24 · 44–49s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move from the physical action into screen detailIntroducing Appshots in Codex
2026-05-21 · 2–8s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep the workspace fixed while the artifact changesCreate and edit presentations faster in PowerPoint
2026-05-22 · 70–77s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep the sharing decision in the editShare Codex plugins with your team
2026-05-21 · 18–25s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep the data beside the completion summaryIntroducing ChatGPT for Excel and Google Sheets
2026-05-06 · 18–24s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Explain navigation with one callout at a timeBring your work into Codex in a few clicks
2026-05-01 · 44–52s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Give verification its own chapterWorkspace agents in ChatGPT: Third-party risk management agent
2026-04-24 · 68–76s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Carry the same input into the device revealDesign your dream room by shopping with ChatGPT
2026-04-09 · 8–14s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Change scroll direction only when the content doesResearch and compare products with ChatGPT
2026-03-27 · 24–32s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Let native change marks do the emphasisIntroducing Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research
2026-01-27 · 16–24s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Expand the result without losing the next actionApps in ChatGPT
2025-10-06 · 28–36s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Show action, processing, and confirmation separatelyBuy it in ChatGPT: Instant Checkout and the Agentic Commerce Protocol
2025-09-29 · 18–26s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Open the deliverable, not just its download cardChatGPT agent Makes Slideshows
2025-07-17 · 66–74s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Reveal the proposed patch before returning to the appShipping code to your IDE with ChatGPT
2025-04-08 · 92–100s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Keep the originating request beside the running previewPrototyping with canvas in ChatGPT
2025-04-08 · 90–98s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Anchor the request to the selected passageWriting with canvas in ChatGPT
2025-04-08 · 82–90s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move toward the parameter while retaining its sourcesHow to blend videos with Sora
2024-12-09 · 46–54s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A dock contracts into one identityIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 0–3s
type-dock-subtraction
Reveal the browser around a persistent composerIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 7–13s
atlas-composer-context-reveal
Keep selection, handles, and assistant on one lineIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 44–50s
atlas-reverse-selection-action
Widen before demonstrating autonomous activityIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 72–76s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Type, hold, replace, then resolve the iconIntroducing ChatGPT Atlas
2025-10-21 · 87–92s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Follow the pointer, then restore the full workspaceA first look at the Codex app
2026-02-02 · 17–22s
codex-click-release-camera
Dim, confirm, dismiss, and reopen without a camera moveA first look at the Codex app
2026-02-02 · 58–63s
codex-modal-relay
Open the diff before pushing into its detailA first look at the Codex app
2026-02-02 · 92.5–98s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Container first, explanation second, live page thirdA Look at ChatGPT agent
2025-07-17 · 4–7s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A connector sequence with a moving background and quiet foregroundA Look at ChatGPT agent
2025-07-17 · 18–24s
agent-task-card-explanation
Grow charts and stagger cards inside a stable previewA Look at ChatGPT agent
2025-07-17 · 34–39s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Hold the subject through aspect-ratio changesChatGPT Images
2025-12-16 · 5–10s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Turn a cutout into a lateral sequenceChatGPT Images
2025-12-16 · 12–16s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Accumulate a diagonal trail of outputsChatGPT Images
2025-12-16 · 25–30s
chatgpt-traveling-image-trail
Let material cuts carry a sentenceThis is ChatGPT Images 2.0
2026-04-21 · 0–4s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Swap language while preserving the poster scaffoldThis is ChatGPT Images 2.0
2026-04-21 · 54–58s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Interrupt the montage, then return with a repeated nameThis is ChatGPT Images 2.0
2026-04-21 · 101–105s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A centered type-on with a temporary color accentMeet ChatGPT Work
2026-07-09 · 3–7s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Switch recording state, then track the growing waveformMeet ChatGPT Work
2026-07-09 · 14–18s
work-observed-waveform-travel
Resolve an image while making room for the next resultMeet ChatGPT Work
2026-07-09 · 44–49s
work-observed-resolving-carousel
Carry the action from a toggle to a quiet activity dotYou can just use your voice | ChatGPT Work
2026-08-24 · 3–7s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Inline object substitutions become a perimeter collageYou can just use your voice | ChatGPT Work
2026-08-24 · 33–37s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A desktop push-in that leaves the composer readableBuild and test iOS apps without leaving Codex
2026-06-15 · 0–5s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Clear the center before completing the sentenceBuild and share apps in Codex
2026-06-02 · 3–7s
codex-word-tiles-collage
Draw the brackets before filling the wordBuild and share apps in Codex
2026-06-02 · 11–15s
type-delimiter-before-word
An overlapping wall collapses to a tiny centerBuild and share apps in Codex
2026-06-02 · 35–40s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Use the pointer as punctuation between title phrasesIntroducing workspace agents in ChatGPT
2026-04-22 · 0–6s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move the highlight before changing the whole viewIntroducing workspace agents in ChatGPT
2026-04-22 · 10–15s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Build a list upward as each new row joinsIntroducing workspace agents in ChatGPT
2026-04-22 · 51–57s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Collapse a label, then cycle icons through its containerWork smarter with your company knowledge in ChatGPT
2025-10-23 · 4–9s
type-chip-retract-expand
Expose provenance before the answer takes overWork smarter with your company knowledge in ChatGPT
2025-10-23 · 25–30s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Release a card from the phone into an arcIntroducing ChatGPT Pulse
2025-09-25 · 5–10s
pulse-device-card-arc
A bottom sheet keeps the illustration continuousIntroducing ChatGPT Pulse
2025-09-25 · 36–41s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A rotating suggestion list resolves into one inputIntroducing ChatGPT Pulse
2025-09-25 · 51–58s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
From title to menu to a turning book markIntroducing ChatGPT Study Mode
2025-07-29 · 0–5s
study-outline-page-turn
Delete the wordmark before the mark settlesIntroducing ChatGPT Study Mode
2025-07-29 · 58–63s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Place the submitted request into a phone before answeringFind the perfect gift by shopping with ChatGPT
2026-03-27 · 8–13s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Reserve space while a result grows above the composerChatGPT skills in beta for ChatGPT Business & Enterprise
2026-03-13 · 13–18s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Let a small menu appear before enlarging itChatGPT skills in beta for ChatGPT Business & Enterprise
2026-03-13 · 38–43s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A short deletion gesture followed by a long quiet endIntroducing Appshots in Codex
2026-05-21 · 38–43s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Separate vertical browsing from horizontal comparisonDesign your dream room by shopping with ChatGPT
2026-04-09 · 26–31s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Leave the control close-up as the result starts playingHow to blend videos with Sora
2024-12-09 · 73–78s
sora-moving-result-pullback
Move toward the action only after the timeline is understoodHow to recut with Sora
2024-12-09 · 50–55s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
A timeline insertion makes room for a second cardHow to storyboard with Sora
2024-12-09 · 48–54s
sora-timeline-insertion
Let an image occupy the middle of a typographic structureCharacter Consistency with 4o Image Generation
2025-03-25 · 3–9s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Show an oversized layer before resizing and placing itTransparent Layers with 4o Image Generation
2025-03-25 · 63–70s
layer-insert-resize-place
Switch from quick variants to word-by-word sign holdsChatGPT Images — Chameleon
2026-04-21 · 18–23s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Bridge a character montage into a sentence with a page turnChatGPT Images — Chameleon
2026-04-21 · 49–55s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Large whole-word cuts after a live-action screenOpenAI Super Bowl 2026 | Codex | You Can Just Build Things
2026-02-08 · 49–57s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move between archive layouts without making every item fly10 years.
2025-12-11 · 26–33s
archive-outline-montage
Use a scale reset before the human closing image10 years.
2025-12-11 · 60–65s
type-paragraph-cuts
Separate receding live action from screen-space textDish with ChatGPT
2025-09-28 · 17–23s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Release the subject while keeping the response on screenRoad Trip with ChatGPT
2025-09-28 · 12–19s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Reveal the exercise through sustained action, not a cutawayPull-Up with ChatGPT
2025-09-28 · 2–8s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Build unusual motion through reactions and insertsIt's time to fly | Codex
2026-06-03 · 47–53s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Finish the internal icon motion before naming the productIntroducing Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research
2026-01-27 · 0–6s
prism-translucent-contours
Pull back after submission to reveal the linked documentIntroducing Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research
2026-01-27 · 43–48s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Grow a composer before revealing its app chipApps in ChatGPT
2025-10-06 · 0–6s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Rotate one phrase while its suffix remains fixedApps in ChatGPT
2025-10-06 · 60–67s
type-masked-name-reel
Let the input gain height without changing its widthBuy it in ChatGPT: Instant Checkout and the Agentic Commerce Protocol
2025-09-29 · 0–5s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Reveal an existing chart by scrolling, not by drawing itCodex for data science
2026-06-09 · 24–29s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Move between report sections while the window stays fixedAnalyze earnings and update your investment thesis with Codex
2026-06-12 · 53–58s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed
Use a luminous pointer path to redirect attentionChatGPT Computer Use: Now faster with Live Picture-in-Picture
2026-07-10 · 4–9s
No interval overlap found; novelty still unreviewed